So you wanna be FAMOUS and fabulous and uber-cool too.
Maybe you wanna be the Chris Rock of maths. Being famous is soooooo cool.
…………….……You get attitude!!!
……………………You Get cool sunglasses!!!
….You get a chauffeur that’s not your mum!
But what are the chances? What is the probability that a kid at your school will become famous one day? Cate Blanchet went to Mathpigs kids’ school. But in Australia we don’t make a fuss. They haven’t put a picture of her on the wall or anything.
So mathspigs let’s work out the probability of you becoming a STAR, BABY!
The first question is how do you measure fame? Do you have to be on TV to be famous? Do you have to be a Hollywood star? Should you be a wax dummy in Madame Tussaud’s? Not as a job. I mean because you are so fabulously famous.
Perhaps, you could use Tom Weller’s humorous Rictus scale (a parody of the Richter Scale) for earthquake intensity using media coverage as a guide to fame. Just replace the persons name for the word ‘scene’.
I’m thinking around ’5′ looks like FAME, but you decide. Now count how many ex-students from your school (and any current ones) who have become famous in the last 20 years and do the maths.
…………………………………………………………………………………..
Rictus
Scale #
Richter Scale
Equivalent
Media Coverage
1
0-3
Small articles in local papers
2
3-5
Lead story on local news; mentioned on network news
3
5-6.5
Lead story on network news; photos in nation newspapers; governor visits scene
4
6.5-7.5
Network correspondents sent to scene; president/PM visits area; commemorative T-shirts appear
5
7.5 up
Covers of weekly news magazines; network specials; “instant books” appear
Mathspig is very excited to note that Pi has been in the news this week.
.
.
.
Firstly, in an article titled Pimp My Memory New Scientist, 2nd April, cited Chao Lu’s feat of remembering π to 67,890 places in November 2005.
.
It took Chao (pictured below) 24 hours and 4 minutes to recite the 67,000plus places!!!!!!!!
.
π
.
If Mathspig was listening I dare say she would have fallen asleep and slammed her snout into the table top at 200kph at about the 300th decimal place.
.
.
But I can’t help wondering what would happen if some one said, Aussie style ‘Nah, mate! You missed one. That 61, 235 place was a 3!!!!!’
π
This is more a feat of memory than maths.
.
Wowwwwww !!!!^2!!!!
ThenThe New Yorker, 4th April 2011, reported on Pi Day activities in the Facing History School (pictured ), Hell’s Kitchen, NY. (Below random students)
.
Maths teachers held a pi-memorisation day on Pi Day (3/14 in USA, which unfortunately in Australia is written 14/3) offering a new iPod Touch as a prize.
π
.
There was also a pi pie-eating contest and a pi “jeopardy” game. The Maths teachers all wore Pi Day teachers with names printed on the back such as Karina “The Algorithm” Garcia.
π
The winner of the pi-memorisation was a sophomore (Year 10 in Australia), Jason Gil, who recalled 162 digits. Yey!!! Go Jason.
.
.
.
.
π
Mathspig urges maths teachers to have a fun maths day. Other subjects have days and events!!! Give maths a big profile in your school. A Pi Day is good. And a pi-memorisation challenge can be lots of fun. Here are three ways to remember Pi.
,
π
1.Phone No. Method
π
Some students at Facing History School, NY committed the pi sequence to memory by putting the numbers in blocks of cellphone numbers.
3.1415926535 8979323846 2643383279 5028841971
.
π
2. Song Method
The Pi sequence can be remembered using a Pi Song. Here’s a song to recall the first 10 digits.
Here is a more entertaining song called Mathematical Pi Song by 4ACT, which proves that good mathematicians make crap singers.
.
.
3. Piem Method
The third way to memorise the pi sequence is to write a PIEM … or Pi Poem.
π
It can be a crazy poem but each word has the number of letters of the digit to be remembered.
π
eg.
How I want a drink, alcoholic of course, after the heavy chapters involving quantum mechanics.
π
Here’s a piem by Maths pig:
.
Get a grip u maths pyschopath I’m afraid piday fun shidz students painfully.
π
All right, already. Some poetic license is allowed. Tricks such as rhymes and mnemonics like the piem will only help memory if they are witty and apt but you must know what you can get away with.
π
How to study for exams? According to studies reported in New Scientist the best way to learn for an exam is to constantly test your memory. Make it work hard. REcall. REcall. REcall.
Newspaper and magazine editors urge their readers to ‘click-on our website poll’ and then they publish the results in the next issue. The newspaper may learn about their readership. This is useful information for marketing but otherwise useless. It’s like asking hat wearers if they wear hats. Let me guess the answer? D’uh!
Included here are some results of two self-selecting surveys, which not only reveal the standard useless statistics but also some highly questionable numerical outcomes. In the Esquire Magazine Survey of Drinking (Sept 2010) 82% of their readers, who were willing to answer a survey about their drinking habits (Whereby, for some reason. 1 beer = 2 drinks), have a University Degree or higher (Or, maybe, 50% of them lie!!!!) and in the Health and Fitness (Oct 2010) magazine survey - Guess what? – magically the numbers for all options add up to 100%. Neat! Didn’t anyone fit more than one category? (Assuming all readers of Health and Fitness mag who are bothered enough to answer a survey on fitness do some exercise.)
A survey is taken but the number of people surveyed is so small as to be irrelevant; not much better than simply asking your mum for her opinion and publishing the results.
Included here is a full-page Women’s Weekly (Oct 2010) ad for an Elizabeth Arden Anti-wrinkle Cream. Look at these wonderful statics. 92%… 85% …Wow! Look at the language. Gives eyes a ‘radiant and luminous look’ Sounds like the DEVIL!!!! Read the small print.
The survey was based on 30 participants and ‘results may vary’.
When the Numbers involved are so SMALL the % Stated is Meaningless.
Newspapers often state that a cancer rate has doubled or increased (See pic) by 28%. Those % changes can be meaningless. For instance, double nothing is still nothing. You need the actual numbers.
Here is a statistic taken from Men’s Health magazine (March 2010). According to the government funded Australian Institute of Health and Welfare the actual number of Australian males who presented with melanoma in 2005 was 6,044
or 0.549 in 1,000
or 1 in 2,000.
If these numbers increase by 28% the number of Australian men presenting with melanoma will be:
0.703 in 1,000
or ~ 2 in 3,000.
These numbers are not so alarming. Then again would you take any notice of statistics of a magazine that suggests a ‘sonic boom’ from a golf club is causing deafness!!!!!
Lotto draws are, as with coin flipping, Independent orUNRELATED EVENTS. Newspapers often publish the least drawn numbers prior to a major prize draw.
When on June 5 2008 the Powerball jackpot reached over $50 million, making it the biggest prize ever offered in any Australian lottery game at the time media commentators went crazy. ( See Crazy Lotto Lovers Go Bananas Again!)
The Today show on Ninesmsn website advised ‘The most-drawn Powerball numbers are 26, 22, 5, 39, 24 and 34. The least drawn numbers are 41, 32, 10, 43, 35 and 20.’ This information is worthless. These facts imply that the balls know whose turn it is and then can organise themselves so that those balls drop down the shoot. As if! The draw is random. Any number is possible.
The winning numbers, in drawn order, were: 5, 21, 11, 38 and 2, with the Powerball 33, with the final prize of $58,737,207.41
Poor old 41, 32, 10,43, 35 and 20 will have to wait for another turn!!!!!!!
Guess Work disguised as a Mathematical method or equation.
Moderately reputable institutions often present statistics and/or calculations, which appear sound but really involve, at best, an educated guess; at worst, a pull-the-number-out-of-your-hat trick.
The RICH LIST is one example. Forbes is a respectable magazine but they are not privy to all the complex financial interests of various list members. How rich is Scrooge McDuck? Like, rooolly rich, dude!!!!! So which one on the Rich List is Scrooge????
Then there are the boffins who produce rubbish formulae forpouring beer, making the perfect piece of toast and popping champagne. These formulae are often sponsored by manufacturers to promote a product such as a new beer brand. Some examples include The Perfect Sitcom (quality = (rd+v)f÷a+s) to promote UKTV Gold; The Perfect Joke (x = (fl + no)/p) to promote some comedian; The Perfect Day (quality = O + NS + Cpm÷T + He) to promote ice cream; The Perfect Rugby Kick (KP = CSP – s + w + r + yn + cr + sc + mt + xn + ctw), which somehow has something to do with a research company called Qinetiq; The Perfect Chip (Tesco)” and so on. This is rubbish maths because most of the ‘variables’ ( x, t, w, etc) cannot be measured. It’s all guesswork!!!! See Mathspig Post Britney’s Naughtiness Rating Calculated for Idiots
When graphs are pretty but provide no real information or are misleading.
Graphs frequently appear in the media with no scales, odd scales or totally misleading scales.
This first graph from the Financial Review: Smart Investor magazine ( Oct 2010) has no scale. You could just scribble a line and call it a graph ( See Above) !!!! Then add a number at the end point to make it look real!
Why use a graph? It’s an investment ad selling an investment product.
The second graph shows that the recent Global Financial Crisis was not so bad. Now look at the y-scale. It’s logarithmic.
Extending a graph or equation beyond defined limits.
Extrapolation is in your head. Just because you have a graph and, maybe, even a formula it doesn’t mean you know all the variables. Put simply, you cannot just extend a graph into the future. You may be right or……. Great Balls of Fire! You could be wrong!
Here is an extract of an article by Jeremy Laurance in The Independent, UK, on 27th April, 2009:
‘At its worst, it could have a devastating global impact, greater than a terrorist attack, nuclear accident or environmental disaster. The World Health Organisation estimates that a mild pandemic could cause up to 7.5 million deaths.’
If you look at the current count as of 11th October 2011 verified World Wide deaths from Swine Flu are 14, 337. (See Swine Flu Count)
Any death is tragic but according to WHO in a normal year, flu kills 12,000 to 20,000 mainly elderly people in Britain and 250,000 around the world.
………………………………………………………………………………………….
